<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is the pursuit of economic growth compatible with the pursuit of environmental sustainability? A discussion from the perspective of carbon emissions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sustainabilityconference2012.weaconferences.net/papers/is-the-pursuit-of-economic-growth-compatible-with-the-pursuit-of-environmental-sustainability-a-discussion-from-the-perspective-of-carbon-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sustainabilityconference2012.weaconferences.net/papers/is-the-pursuit-of-economic-growth-compatible-with-the-pursuit-of-environmental-sustainability-a-discussion-from-the-perspective-of-carbon-emissions/</link>
	<description>24th September to 21st October, 2012</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Horacio Ariel Feinstein		</title>
		<link>https://sustainabilityconference2012.weaconferences.net/papers/is-the-pursuit-of-economic-growth-compatible-with-the-pursuit-of-environmental-sustainability-a-discussion-from-the-perspective-of-carbon-emissions/#comment-23</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horacio Ariel Feinstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainabilityconference2012.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?post_type=paper&#038;p=132#comment-23</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[G. Charonis&#039; presentation puts up (see his Table 1) the relationship  between the (needed) global reduction of environmental impact for the next 40 years in terms of global decarbonization (CO2 intensity reduction); and the conclusion is that at higher rates of global economic growth the rate of the needed decarbonization, for a given reduction of environmental impact, is higher.

Further on,  trascending the arithmetical exercise  and swinging into sociopolitical implications, when we dissagregate the abovementioned global analysis into a rough division between rich (for example, as a proxy, OECD&#039;s nations) and poor countries we have to assume (from some ethical standpoint) that the burden of the decarbonization must fall on rich countries, who are major responsables of the current state of global environment. On this behalf, developped world countries must reinforce their decarbonization processes  so to overwhelmingly more than compensate the ongoing emissions of poorer countries  in order to reach a sustained overall global reduction of carbon emissions.

As a result of this, in order to acheive environmental goals, rich countries must forget about growth while deepening decarbonization efforts to paramount levels. If this happens, it will represent a significant move towards environmental justice and it will show the rest of the world a sustainable productive pathway.

Is this feasible somewhere? 

If the answer is negative, as I presume, what can we do?

Is the penny beginning to drop or is it that the very few don&#039;t want to invest even the pennies in decarbonization?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G. Charonis&#8217; presentation puts up (see his Table 1) the relationship  between the (needed) global reduction of environmental impact for the next 40 years in terms of global decarbonization (CO2 intensity reduction); and the conclusion is that at higher rates of global economic growth the rate of the needed decarbonization, for a given reduction of environmental impact, is higher.</p>
<p>Further on,  trascending the arithmetical exercise  and swinging into sociopolitical implications, when we dissagregate the abovementioned global analysis into a rough division between rich (for example, as a proxy, OECD&#8217;s nations) and poor countries we have to assume (from some ethical standpoint) that the burden of the decarbonization must fall on rich countries, who are major responsables of the current state of global environment. On this behalf, developped world countries must reinforce their decarbonization processes  so to overwhelmingly more than compensate the ongoing emissions of poorer countries  in order to reach a sustained overall global reduction of carbon emissions.</p>
<p>As a result of this, in order to acheive environmental goals, rich countries must forget about growth while deepening decarbonization efforts to paramount levels. If this happens, it will represent a significant move towards environmental justice and it will show the rest of the world a sustainable productive pathway.</p>
<p>Is this feasible somewhere? </p>
<p>If the answer is negative, as I presume, what can we do?</p>
<p>Is the penny beginning to drop or is it that the very few don&#8217;t want to invest even the pennies in decarbonization?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
